<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A reason why Photoshop CS4 kicks ass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psyked.co.uk/adobe/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Google &quot;Seam Carving&quot; if you&#039;d like to know how it&#039;s done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google &#8220;Seam Carving&#8221; if you&#8217;d like to know how it&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing obvious in terms of quality loss - I should mention that the screenshot above is pretty poor quality - I forgot to turn on antialiasing in my Photoshop preferences when I did that!

I think there are limits to what it can do when you&#039;re scaling things up or down - my best guess is that it&#039;s working with convolution filters to pick out areas of high contrast and edges, and then scaling portions of the image as it goes.

If your image has got a lot of large artefacts then it&#039;ll preserve them, but it does a pretty fine job of matching blurs around edges.  

The only thing I&#039;ve picked up on is the scaling of shades and tones - in the image above you can notice that the sky colours have been squashed in the top picture - it&#039;s preserved the general texture, but with the sky colours being a very similar tone, it hasn&#039;t really picked up on the colour changes and dealt with those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing obvious in terms of quality loss &#8211; I should mention that the screenshot above is pretty poor quality &#8211; I forgot to turn on antialiasing in my Photoshop preferences when I did that!</p>
<p>I think there are limits to what it can do when you&#8217;re scaling things up or down &#8211; my best guess is that it&#8217;s working with convolution filters to pick out areas of high contrast and edges, and then scaling portions of the image as it goes.</p>
<p>If your image has got a lot of large artefacts then it&#8217;ll preserve them, but it does a pretty fine job of matching blurs around edges.  </p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;ve picked up on is the scaling of shades and tones &#8211; in the image above you can notice that the sky colours have been squashed in the top picture &#8211; it&#8217;s preserved the general texture, but with the sky colours being a very similar tone, it hasn&#8217;t really picked up on the colour changes and dealt with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Very coool James, but how does content-aware-scaling look in high-resolution?  Any noticeable artifacts, blurs, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very coool James, but how does content-aware-scaling look in high-resolution?  Any noticeable artifacts, blurs, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>You know, I think it is - I grabbed the picture from Google Image search, but was never able to find it again to give some attribution!

I&#039;ll change the &#039;some castle&#039; bit in the post above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think it is &#8211; I grabbed the picture from Google Image search, but was never able to find it again to give some attribution!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll change the &#8216;some castle&#8217; bit in the post above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulius Uza</title>
		<link>http://www.psyked.co.uk/photoshop/a-reason-why-photoshop-cs4-kicks-ass.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulius Uza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Sorry for the off topic, but is this Trakai Castle in the picture? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the off topic, but is this Trakai Castle in the picture? <img src="http://www.psyked.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?9d7bd4" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 622/627 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.psyked.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 10:17:54 -->
